Référence

Helmuth Cremer, Firouz Gahvari et Pierre Pestieau, « Accidental bequests: a curse for the rich and a boon for the poor », IDEI Working Paper, n° 591, novembre 2009.

Résumé

When accidental bequests signal otherwise unobservable individual characteristics such as productivity and longevity, the tax administration should partition the population into two groups: One consisting of people who do not receive an inheritance and the other of those who do. The first tagged group gets a second-best tax à la Mirrlees; the second group a first-best tax schedule. The solution implies that receiving an inheritance makes high-ability types worse off and low-ability types better off. High-ability individuals will necessarily face a bequest tax of more than 100%, while low-ability types face a bequest tax that can be smaller as well as larger than 100%. With a Rawlsian social welfare function, the low-ability types too face a more than 100% tax on bequests.

Mots-clés

Accidental bequests; estate tax; tagging; first best; second best;

Codes JEL

  • H21: Efficiency • Optimal Taxation